Hiyō class fleet aircraft carriers (1941)

Hiyō class aircraft carriers (1941)

Japanese Navy Japan, 1938-45: IJN Jun’yō, Hiyō

The first IJN converted liners

Hiyo prow Jun’yō (隼鷹, “Peregrine Falcon”) and Hiyō (飛鷹, “Flying Hawk”) were two Hiyō-class aircraft carriers of the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN). They were started before the war as the passenger liner Kashiwara Maru and Izumo Maru, respectively, but both were purchased by the IJN in 1941 while under construction. They were both converted into aircraft carriers on similar designs due to their common base.

Completed in May and July 1942, they participated in the main Japanese Pacific offensives and campaigns campaigns, in the Aleutians, Guadalcanal, New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, the Battle of the Philippine Sea (where Hiyō was sunk). Lacking both aircraft and pilots, Jun’yō by late 1944 was used as a transport, torpedoed twice in her carrer and under repairs until March 1945 until cancelled and BU after the war. Note that some authors would speak of the Jun’yō class, and classify them as “escort carriers”.

Conversion genesis: From Liners to Aircraft carriers

These two vessels started existence as the fast luxury passenger liners Izumo Maru and Kashiwara Maru ordered by Nippon Yusen Kaisha, or Japan Mail Steamship Company, in late 1938. At the time like previous submarine or seaplane tenders built by the IJN to be later converted, they proceeded froom anagreement between the Navy Ministry and the company: In exchange for funding 60% of their construction costs they had to be designed in order to facilitate a conversion to aircraft carrier later. This was not an ad hoc, desperate wartime measure but rather a planned requisition.

Conversion of liners was not new at the time: HMS Argus showed the way already in 1918: She was the former Italian liner Conte Rosso built at Beardmore, requisiioned during the war and converted as carrier, commissioned in September 1918, so little time before the hostilities ceased. At the time this demonstrated to all navies the potential of such ships for such conversions. In WW2 Ialy will convert for their part two former liners as fleet aircraft carriers, the Aquila class and other nations would have similar endeavour, which rarely went to fruition.

The basic design of the Izumo Maru class therefore was planned from the beginning with a set of features facilitating the later conversion process. Unlike common liners they had a double hull, extra fuel oil capacity and provisions to fit additional transverse and longitudinal bulkheads for protection and bracing to support the deck, and the installation of a longitudinal bulkhead separating the turbine rooms in case of flooding. Steel frames were provisioned also to support the future flight deck, and there was extra room between decks, for a future hangar.

Also a rearrangement of the superstructure and passenger accommodations were made in order to facilitate the future installation of aircraft elevators. There were also more space in between walls and sheating, for future additional wiring. They were also given a bulbous bow, known to increase speed but sekldom used ion civilian designs, and extra tanks, void, buried deep withing for aviation gasoline storage, placed aft of the machinery spaces.

The only proper requirement of the Japan Mail Steamship Company was a top speed speed of 24 knots (44 km/h; 28 mph) in order to save fuel, but the Navy indicated they were only satisfied with no less than 25.5 knots (47.2 km/h; 29.3 mph) in order to ensuure fleet operations. The compromise was to limit performance for thee turbines installed, with a governor at 80% of maximum power for peacetime use.

Both ships were laid down in military shipyard in order to ensure this “military grade” readiness: SS Kashiwara Maru and Izumo Maru at Kawasaki Shipyard, Kobe in 30 November 1939, and SS Izumo Maru at Mitsubishi Shipyard, Nagasaki on 20 March 1939. She was the lead vessel, but was launched two days after her sister ship, although converted and completed sooner. This way, given the usual conventions, the class is not called Junyo but Hiyo.

Purchase and conversions start

junyo on navsrource.org

Both were purchased on 10 February 1941, four months before launch, by the Navy Ministry at a final cost of ¥48,346,000; and provisioned their armament and provisions for aircraft equipments, plus telemeters and fire con trols systems, for a supplementary cost of ¥27,800,000 and global, for the two, of ¥38,073,000 and ¥114,219,000 including their first aviation park. SS Kashiwara Maru and Izumo Maru were denamed, and provionally became No.1001 (Dai 1001 bankan) and No.1002 (Dai 1002 bankan) to keep work secret. The name Jun’yō (Peregrine Falcon) and Hiyō (Flying Hawk) were later chosen in accordance to allegoric flying beasts proper to aircraft carriers at the time.

The admiralty however did not have them classified as fleet carriers due to their still unsufficient speed but rather auxiliary aircraft carrier (Tokusetsu kokubokan). However after the loss of four carriers at Midway (Kaga, Akagi, Hiryu; Soryu) in order to beef up the 1s Fleet air force and wating for dditional proper fleet carriers (notably the Unryu class), they were redesignated as a regular carriers (Kokubokan) in July 1942, so about the time IJN Hiyō was completed.

Design of the conversion

As completed both vessels added a flight deck to the original hull and a large command island and funnel on the port side. The hull measured in the end 219.32 meters (719 ft 7 in) overall for an uncnaged beam of 26.7 meters (87 ft 7 in) and 8.15 meters (26 ft 9 in) in draft at normal load. Standard displaced was 24,150 metric tons (23,770 long tons) an the crew ranged from 1,187 to 1,224 officers and ratings.

Powerplant: Best range of any IJN carriers

junyo-left-side navsrource.org

Both liners had been fitted with two Mitsubishi-Curtis geared steam turbine sets. Togther they produced a combined output of 56,250 shaft horsepower (41,950 kW). They drove 5.5-meter (18 ft) propellers at the end of the shafts. Steam came from six water-tube boilers which differed from yards: Jun’yō had Mitsubishi three-drum models working at 40 kg/cm2 (3,923 kPa; 569 psi) pressure and 420 °C (788 °F). IJN Hiyō had Kawasaki-LaMont boilers (specs unknown).

Despite their machinery was designed for merchant service, it still was four times better than on the military-grade and purpose-built IJN Hiryū !
The latter indeed managed 153,000 shp but on 17,300 long tons, and 34.3 knots (64 km/h; 40 mph). It’s ratio and displacement were indeed completely different, she notably had 7.84 m (30 ft)draft and only 22.32 m (73 ft) width.

The Hiyo class had a designed speed of 25.5 knots, and on trials they managed to exceeded them, but just. With 4,100 metric tons (4,000 long tons) of fuel oil onboard, their range reached 11,700 nautical miles (21,700 km; 13,500 mi) at 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph), which was quite honorable, in factway better than the Soryu, Hiryu, Zuikaku class, or Kaga-Akagi on that matter. Simply this was an amazing feature of the design, more so with that speed, due to the economic nature of the engines, not tailored for speed.

Flight Deck and accomodations

-The flight deck as completed measured 210.3 meters (690 ft), so slightly shorter than their overall lenght, more so formward.

-Maximum width was 27.3 meters (89 ft 7 in), better than most fleet acrriers of the time, thanks to her larger beam.

-The large island starboard was overhanging from the side with a large, bulgy structures going down almost to the waterline.

-Engineers managed something new, they had the truncated exhausts from all boilers grouped into a single funnel and not side of the hull, below flight deck level as usual.

This innovation, with the funnel 26° angled outwards, allowed a better smoke disparsal far from the deck, and avoided “hot points” close to the flight deck. Models already were tested with this shape and smoke proving this was not interfering with flight operations. It became a feature of many future IJN carriers.

Their main feature was two superimposed hangars, like Ryujo and Ark Royal. Each was 153 meters (502 ft) long for 15 meters (49 ft 3 in) in width ony, but 5 meters (16 ft 5 in). The difference with the width was explained by all the crew quarters and stored installed on both sides of the hangar.

For fire safety, each hangar was subdivided into four sections in which were installed folded down fire curtains on rails. They could be deployed at a moment notice. These sections were also equipped with fire fighting foam dispensers on either each side, but not sprinklers. The air group was managed in between these two levels and the deck, by two equal size square (with rounde corners) elevators 14.03 meters (46 ft 0 in) long and wide.

Maximum capacity was 5,000 kilograms (11,000 lb), compatible with most IJN aicraft in service at the time. They reached the deck, from the lowest lever, in just 15 seconds. They had no catapult just like other IJN carriers, and planes landed by catching one of the nine electrically operated Kure type model 4 arresting gears. Two main Type 3 crash barricades were also installed at the main island level. For downed planes, boats service, or convertible seaplane operation, a crane was installed on the port side of the flight deck, next to the rear elevator, which could be collapsed flush in flight deck in case.


IJN Junyo
IJN Hiyo detailed plan, 1942

Being a civilian ship nevertheless it was difficult to “load” the design with heavy armor, and notably due to their role, a more minimalistic approach was chosen, to protect vitals, and against aviation fire mostly: They had no belt but an armored deck 2″ thick (50 mm) plus an extra 0.8″ (20 mm) plating over of ducol steel over the machinery, and 1″ (25mm) box protection for their magazines and aviation fuel, also of ducol steel. This was insufficient to block a bomb penetrating the hangar, although fire fighting equipments were present, but at least, bomb fragments to penetrate the vitals. Against torpedoes however, apart the double hull, and some compartimentation including for the machinery spaces subdivided by transverse and longitudinal bulkheads to limit flooding, no particular measures has been taken. Junyo will pay for it dearly in 1944. By March 1944 however IJN Junyo aircraft fuel tanks receiving additional concrete protection.


5-in DP guns

By it’s composition, this was a classic mix between the two standards of any IJN aicraft carrier of the time: Twin 5-in guns Type 89 dual purpose (DP) guns and triple 25 mm Type 96 AA mounts. The latter was augmented drastically until June 1944, mostly with single mounts.

Six twin Type 89 5-in (12.7 cm) DP

These 40-caliber 12.7 cm Type 89 anti-aircraft (AA) guns in twin mounts were located on six sponsons along the sides of the hull, supported by pillars. There were two forward at the same level, and because of the island, one opposite it, to port, another aft, just before the rear elevator, and two starboard after the island.

  • 23.45-kilogram (51.7 lb) Frag shell
  • 8 and 14 rounds per minute
  • muzzle velocity of 700–725 m/s (2,300–2,380 ft/s)
  • 45° max elevation
  • range of 14,800 meters (16,200 yd)
  • ceiling 9,400 meters (30,800 ft)

Eight triple Type 96 25 mm AA

They were also located on sponsons along the flght deck, four port side, opposite and aft of the island, and four starboard, behind the aft 5-in DP guns and at the level of the rear elevator.

  • .25-kilogram (0.55 lb) shells
  • muzzle velocity of 900 m/s (3,000 ft/s)
  • maximum range of 7,500 meters (8,202 yd)
  • effective ceiling of 5,500 meters (18,000 ft)/+85°
  • rate of fire 110-120 rounds per minute

This issues were known: No suitable targeting system, vibrations, reloading labor intensive due to frequent need to change the fifteen-round magazines. In 1943, four additional triple mounts of the 25mm/60 96-shiki AA guns and two twin were added on both vessels. Junyo from March 1944 had seven extra triple 25mm/60 and 18 single 25mm/60 Type 96. In August 1944, twelve triple 25/60 96-shiki, and six 28-tubes 120mm AA Rocket Launchers.


They were completed in May-August with no radar, but this was provisioned in the design. During their late 1942 overhaul, both were fitted with the 1-shiki 2-go early warning radar, mounted on their bridge’s roof. In 1943, they kept the 1-shiki 2-go radar, but a second was added aft of the flight deck, at the level of the rear elevator and on the port side, opposite the island.

By August 1944 the surviving IJN Junyo was given a 3-shiki 1-go radar, replacing the one fitted on the bridge’s roof.

Other perks

In addition to a main telemeter for their main artillery installed on the bridge and another installed on a structure forward of the island, they had extra side safety nets, mostly installed alongsde the aft part of the flight deck, starting at the island port and starboard, and ending at the level of the aft lift. They were mounted on elevating frames, two port and three starboard. For communications they had a main tripod mast aft of the island, behind the funnel, a main radio mast just aft the funnel and two derrick antenna for long range communication on the side of the flight deck, port and starboard on sponsons.

The flight deck landing lip adt was beveled, painted in the standard red and white band pattern to make the start, and on both sides were installed sets of lights to help the pilot figuring out his position and balance approach. Another marking this time with direction indicators (painted white) were set in between the crashing barriers at the ismand level for the long launching spot, and at the end of the flight deck, cladded in metal plating while the rest of the ship, to the exception of the landing area, was wooden-sheated. Space aboard was limited. Two “vals”, wingtip to wingtip, covered the entire beam though. Therefore parking was difficult.

The ships also carried several service boats: Two diesel-powered cutters aft, under the landing deck open space and reached by the aft cranes, a small yawl under davits under the side deck close to the island, another on the port side, opposite the island, but the rest comprised inflatable rafts installed wherever possible. The ships carried four paravanes for mines cutting, stored close to the bow where they were fitted, on either wall of the forward hangar section. Two static anchorage extra anchored were located close to the bow. There were side ladders to mount/dismount small boats on the starboard. For stability, they were both fitted with anti-rolling bars underwater.

Air Group

Technically, these vessels could carry 54 aircraft, which was honorable, but less than the Zuikaku class for example, which carried 72, or the Hiryu and Soryu which carried 64 and nine spares, despite their smaller size. This was expected however due to the limited width of the hangars. When completed in the summer of 1942 they wre wiven the “classic trio” of the time: A5M “Claude” fighters, D3A1 diving bombers, and B5N torpedo bombers (“Zeke”, “Val” and “Kate” in allied code). Exact composition varied over time and ship.

As completed, Junyo had 16 A6M2 “Zeke” fighters (which replaced the planned 12 A5M plus four in storage) and 18, later 24 D3A (40) plus either spare and nine “Kates”, which were nine in July, for 21 “Zeke” so 48 total, plus probable spares.

Hiyo nad 21 “Zeke”, 18 D3A and 9 B5N when completed in August, but in early 1943, 27 fighters and 12 torpedo bombers only.

In November 1943, Junyo received its first 12 A6M5, in complement of her 12 A6M2s. The rest of heir air group comprised nine D3A2 “Val” completed by nine D4Y “Judy” and nine B5N so 51 aicraft.

IHN Hiyo retained her A6M2s in late 1943, but in June, at the battle of the Philippines, she had nine of them plus eighteen A6M5, in complement of eighteen D3A2 “Val” and nine B6N. She never operated the D4Y contrary to her sister.

From June 1944 until she was torpedoed and sent in repairs, she had nine A5M2, 18 A5M5 fighters, nine D3A2 “Val” and nine D4Y Suisei “Judy” and nine B6N Tenzan “Jill”, both being for more capable. Her air group was sent to other carriers when she was sent to repairs, and never returned.

Aichi D3A2 “Val”, 65th Kokutai aboard IJN Jun’yo, June 1944.

Yokosuka D4Y “Judy”, 634th Kokutai IJN Jun’yo, August 1944

Mitsubishi A6M5b “Zeke”, 652th Kokutai, IJN Jun’yo, June 1944


Author’s illustration of IJN Junyo in 1944, battle of the Philippines

⚙ Specs 1942

Dimensions 219.32 x 26.7 x 8.15 (719 ft 7in x 87 ft 7in x 26 ft 9in)
Displacement 21,150 t. standard -28,000 t. Full Load
Propulsion 2 GS turbines, 8 Kampon wt boilers, 56,250 hp.
Speed 25.5 knots (47.2 km/h; 29.3 mph)
Range 11,700 nmi (21,700 km; 13,500 mi) at 18 knots (33 kph, 21 mph)
Armor Belt 25-50mm (0.98-1.97 in)
Armament 6×2 127 AA (5 in), 8×3 25 mm AA, 54 aircraft
Electronics Type 13, Type 21 early-warning radar
Crew 1,187-1,224

Sources/ Read more


Sturton, Ian, J. Gardiner’s, R. Chesneau Conway’s all the worlds fighting ships 1922-1947

Brown, J. D. (2009). Carrier Operations in World War II. Naval Institute Press (NIP).

Campbell, John (1985). Naval Weapons of World War II. NIP

Hata, Ikuhiko; Yasuho Izawa (1989) [1975]. Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units in World War II. NIP

Jentschura, Hansgeorg; Jung, Dieter & Mickel, Peter (1977). Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869–1945. NIP

Lengerer, Hans & Rehm-Takahara, Tomoko (1985). “The Japanese Aircraft Carriers Junyo and Hiyo”. Lambert, Andrew’s (ed.). Warship IX. Conway

Lundstrom, John B. (2005). The First Team and the Guadalcanal Campaign. Annapolis, Maryland: NIP

Polmar, Norman & Genda, Minoru (2006). Aircraft Carriers: A History of Carrier Aviation and Its Influence on World Events. NIP

Stille, Mark (2005). Imperial Japanese Navy Aircraft Carriers 1921–1945. New Vanguard. Osprey Publishing.

Tully, Anthony P. (2006). “IJN Hiyo: Tabular Record of Movement”. Combinedfleet.com. 2011.

Tully, Anthony P. (1999). “IJN Junyo: Tabular Record of Movement”. Combinedfleet.com. 2011.


ONI schematics of Junyo

On globalsecurity.org

On navypedia.org


On historyofwar.org

combinedfleet.com additional photos

On ww2db.com

Hiyo on combinedfleet.com


On pwencycl.kgbudge.com

The model’s corner

Tamiya's WL series 1:700 Junyo
Tamiya’s WL series 1:700 Junyo

The class kits on scalemates

IJN ww2 IJN Hiyo

Hiyo was commissioned on 31 July 1942, under Captain Akitomo Beppu, assigned to the Second Carrier Division, 1st Air Fleet after the losses in Midway, flagship of Rear Admiral Kakuji Kakuta from 12 August. After some training she arrived at Truk to join Jun’yō on 9 October for Guadalcanal operations with the 3rd Fleet.

On the night of 16 October they launched their air groups on American transports off Lunga Point, from 180 nautical miles north of Lunga. At 05:15 the 12A6M Zeros and 18 B5Ns reached their objective and surprised to USN destroyers shelling IJA supply dumps, at 07:20. USS Aaron Ward was targeted without effect, while a B5N was shot down, another making a crash landing. Jun’yō’s eight B5Ns attacked USS Lardner and were hunted down by USMC Grumman F4F Wildcat fighters at 07:32, shooting down three, two later crash-damaging and later three D3A after missing USS Lardner. Zeros shot down one (13 claimed).

Her generator room however took fire on 21 October and she was reduced to 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph), RADM Kakuta making IJN Jun’yō his flagship while Hiyo returned to Truk for repairs, tansferring to her sister 3 Zeros, 1 D3A, 5 B5Ns to compensate losses., the remaining flying to Rabaul and later to New Britain’s airfield on 23 October, attacking Guadalcanal on the 24. Buin, New Guinea, on 1 November and attacked American ships off Lunga Point on 11 November. Escorted by 18 Zeros from IJN Hiyō and 204th Naval Air Group her nine D3As slightly damaged three cargo ships, loosing 4, plus another crash landed. Zeros shot down also four out of six Wildcats, losing two.

IJN Hiyō left Truk in early December, rejoined by her air group on the way to Kure, refitted 26 February-4 March 1943, having additional AA as well and additional radar. After training in the Inland Sea she returned to Truk on 22 March, with an air group detached from Hiyō for Operation I-Go on the Solomon Islands and New Guinea. On 7 April her air group formed the third wave at Guadalcanal, escorted by 24 Zeros and 6 from Zuihō. They rampaged the Sealark Channel an claimed three US aircraft for one Zero, three “val”. Eventually USS Aaron Ward was sunk as the the oil tanker Kanawha, minesweeper HMNZS Moa and other damaged.

She took part in the attacks on Oro Bay, New Guinea on 11 April, with 9 Zeros escorting D3As. One claimed, for one “Val”. 17 Zeros a day later covered three waves on Port Moresby, with nine victories claimed for no loss. On 14 April, Milne Bay was attacked, also in New Guinea with a grand total of 75 Zeros and her own pilots claimed three for no loss whileht eD3As claimed two transports. They were back to Truk on 18 April.

As Attu Island was retaken by the USN on 11 May, the IJN staff sent the Second Carrier Division from Truk, three battleships, two heavy cruisers, via Japan on 25 May. Attu fell before they evern departed. Rear Admiral Munetaka Sakamaki ordred Hiyō from Yokosuka on 7 June, to join Junyō to Truk but the latter was torpedoed by the Gato-class submersible USS Trigger off Miyakejima. She had her starboard bow and boiler room off but was able to return to Japan while her fighters went on to Truk, arriving on 15 July, rassigned to IJN Ryūhō along with RADM Sakamaki and staff.

Repairs in Yokosuka went on until 15 September and Captain Tamotsu Furukawa took command on 1 September, after which she trained for two months until her air group was reconstituted in Singapore: 24 Zeros, 18 D3As, 9 B5Ns off Singapore on 3 December, assigned as an aircraft ferry from then on. On 9 December she departed for Truk, making a fuisr delivery run on 22 December. Next she landed more in Saipan, dismounted and stored in the hangars. Her air group was sent meanwhile in Kavieng and Rabaul, claiming 80 victories for 12 losses.

Back to Japan on 1 January 1944, she was overhauled. Captain Toshiyuki Yokoi took command from 15 February and she was reunited with her air group on 2 March and the carrier force was being had restructurated, with a single air group assigned to an entire carrier division due to the lack of pilots. The 652nd Naval Air Group was assigned to the Second Carrier Division (Hiyō, Jun’yō, Ryūhō), last to be rebuilt with 30 A6M3 and 13 A6M5 Zeros, four D3As and eventually a total of 81 fighters, 36 dive bombers and 27 torpedo bombers. After training in the Inland Sea, until 11 May, she headed for Tawi-Tawi, Philippines, closer to the oil wells in Borneo and to defend Palau and the western Carolines. Problem was American submarines were were very active in the area.

Battle of the Philippine Sea

The fleet en route to Guimaras Island (central Philippines) started carrier operation practice on 13 June 1944 when Vice-Admiral Jisaburō Ozawa received news or the US attack on the Mariana Islands, and after refuelling the fleet was at sea again. Spotting Task Force 58 (18 June) Ozawa launched his air strikes, including from the 652nd Naval Air Group (81 Zeros, 27 D3As, 9 Yokosuka D4Y “Judy”, 18 Nakajima B6N “Jill” torpedo bombers) from his three carriers, the first wav being in flight at 09:30. Misdirected, they failed to find the Americans although one squadron eventually found an American task group but most were lost to the CAP for no damage inflicted.

The second air strike started at 11:00, in company of extra planes from Shōkaku and Zuikaku. Also misdirected, they made no damage and landed for some at Rota and Guam to refuel, the remainder trying to find back the carriers. Though, some found USS Wasp and Bunker Hill but lost five D4Ys to AA, spotted by Radar. The other from Guam was mauled down by 41 Grumman F6F Hellcats in interception. A single fighter, 8 dive bombers made it back with 49 other aircraft.

Turning north-west to regroup and refuel at a distance the US Task Forces eventually found the Japanese fleet retiring, prompting VADM Marc Mitscher to ordered an air strike. IJN Hiyō was soon spotted, targeted, and hit by two bombs, one crashing on the bridge, decapitated command, and a torpedo by a Grumman TBF Avenger from USS Belleau Wood which hit her starboard engine room. Fires started but were mastered and IJN Hiyō was able to go on at slow speed while two hours later, unchecked gasoline vapors cuased a very powerful explosion, knocked out all power out, and having uncontrolled fires destroying the ship, before she was evacuated and sank, stern first. Fortunately 1,200 men were rescued by her escorting destroyers, while 247 went with her to the bottom.

Junyo in Sasebo, 26 Sept. 1945

IJN ww2 IJN Jun’yō

Aft flight deck view

Jun’yō was commissioned on 3 May 1942, assigned to the Fourth Carrier Division, 1st Air Fleet with Ryūjō under Rear Admiral Kakuji Kakuta. She was tasked for Operation AL, an attack planned on the Aleutian Islands as a warnigng point before the Kurile Islands, just as Midway was nder siege. On 3 June, she launched 9 Zeros and 12 D3As to attack Dutch Harbor (Unalaska Island) but further operations were cancelled due to bad weather, the Zeros claming a single PBY Catalina when back. A second airstrike wa slaunched on US destroyers just spotted by aviation, but they were never found again.

Another airstrike totallin 15 Zeros, 11 D3As, and 6 B5Ns bombed Dutch Harbor but they were intercepted by 8 Curtiss P-40 fighters, claiming 2 Zeros, 3 D3As while conceding 2. There was also an air attack on Junyo, but which failed to do any damage. A Martin B-26 Marauder and another PBY were shot down by the CAP, a Boeing B-17 by the Japanese AA. Due to the results of Midway, Junyo was redesignated a Kokubokan, now under Captain Okada Tametsugu command from July. She was in Truk on 9 October with her sister Hiyō in the Second Carrier Division, intended for Guadalcanal operations with the 3rd Fleet.

On the night of 16 October, the two carriers were ordered to attack the American transports off Lunga Point, Guadalcanal and they moved south to their launching point 180 miles (290 km) north of Lunga. At 05:15 each ship launched nine each A6M Zeros and B5Ns (one of Jun’yō’s B5Ns was forced to turn back with mechanical problems) which reached the target and discovered two destroyers bombarding Japanese supply dumps on Guadalcanal around 07:20.

IJN Hiyō’s aircraft tried to sink but mostly near-missed USS Aaron Ward, but the latter still short fown one of her attacking B5N and damaged another (lost at sea). Jun’yō’s eight B5Ns attacked USS Lardner but were decimated by F4F Wildcats, lossing three B5Ns, two more crash landing for one claimed Wildcat, but one Zero lost. Hiyō was reduced to 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph) and transferred three Zeros, one D3A and five B5Ns to her sister ship while RADM Kakuji Kakuta transferred his flag aboard Jun’yō for the 2nd division.

Japanese bomb explodes near USS Enterprise, Battle of Santa Cruz Islands, 26 October 1942

In late October 1942, Jun’yō was at the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands: She had 18 Zeros, 18 D3As and 9 B5Ns and at 05:00 on the 26th, launched 14 Zeros and 6 few D3As to Henderson Field, falsely reported in Japanese hands: They tried to land and were greeted on arrival by AA fire and taking off F4F Wildcats: All were shot down. At 09:30, Jun’yō launched another air strike which found and attacked USS Enterprise as well as the the battleship USS South Dakota and the light cruiser USS San Juan. Only the latter two were hit, but with little damage.

A B5N passed in front of USS northampton at Santa Cruz.

She lost three “Vals” and a single “Kate”, when met by Douglas SBD Dauntless dive bombers, the latter showing to be capable fighters when lightened by their bombs and low on gasoline. RADM Kakuta then ordered a third air strike at 14:15, with six remaining B5Ns just preceived from the damaged IJN Shōkaku, plus nine “Vals” from both carriers. Six B5Ns and six D3As escorted by six Zeros fell on USS Hornet, badly damaged earlier, and one torpedo hit from a Shōkaku’s “Kate” increased her list, added to more seams created by near-misses to have her abandoned before she was finished off by two dive bombers hits.

By mid-November 1942, Jun’yō escorted a convoy to Guadalcana which led to the first 3-day long Naval Battle of Guadalcanal operating by then 27 A6M3 Zeros, 12 D3A2s and 9 B5N2s and havig six Zeros in her Combat Air Patrol (CAP) in the air when SBDs from USS Enterprise arrived, followed by an air strike from Henderson Field which sunk seven transports, the remaining four badly damaged. USS Enterprise ws eventually spotted, leading Jun’yō to launch an air strike, but they failed to locate the carrier.

December 1942-January 1943 saw her covering more convoys to Wewak, New Guinea and she stayd in Truk on 20 January, the covered the evacuation from Guadalcanal in February. That month she was overhauled in Japan and returned to Truk on 22 March, this tme with her sister IJN Hiyō.[ Her air group was left to Rabaul (2 April) as she sailed to participated to Operation I-Go in the Solomon Islands and New Guinea.

Jun’yō’s air group claimed 16 American aircraft for 7 A6Ms, 2 D3As as well as sinking USS Aaron Ward. Her air group was sent to Buin in Papua New Guinea on 2 July, to operate on Rendova Island (30 June), claming 37 US planes shot down for 9. The group was disbanded on 1 September and she was back in Japan by late July, ferrying aircraft to Sumatra (mid-August), troops and supplied to the Carolines (September-October 1943).

On 5 November 1943 while underway to Truk she was ambushed off Bungo Suidō by USS Halibut. One of the four torpedoes launched hit her aft, causing four dead but concussion but damage was light, no flooding but her rudder damaged. She was repaired and refitted until 29 February 1944 in Kure while her air group was reconstituted at Singapore. She went there to recuperate 24 Zeros, 18 D3As and 9 B5Ns, transferred to Truk and Kavieng in December, then Rabaul (25 January 1944). From there, her Zeros claimed 40 Allied aircraft, 30 probable, traded for most of the air group being shot down and rare survivors left on Truk on 20 February, the units disbanded.

With a restructured air groups assigned to carrier division and no longer a sole aircraft carrier, she share wih her sister ship Hiyō and Ryūhō the 652nd Naval Air Group (2nd Carrier Division) from 1st March. In all, it comprised in common 30 Model 21 Zeros, 13 Model 52 Zeros (A6M2 and 5), four D3A2 “Val” from 1st April, a meagre portion of the planned 81 fighters, 36 dive bombers and 27 torpedo bombers. She training in the Inland Sea with her new air group until 11 May, and sailed for Tawi-Tawi, Philippines on a new base closer to oilfields of Borneo.

Junyo, Aft view
Junyo, Aft view

They were expected an attack on the Palau and western Carolines but there was no airfield suitable for pilot training while the area was infested by US submarines. The whole situation resolved at th cataclysmic Battle of the Philippine Sea:

While underway to the Guimares Island, central Philippines, on 13 June, for carrier operations, VADM Jisaburō Ozawa learned about an attack on the Mariana Islands and CarDiv 2 sortied in the Philippine Sea, spotting TF 58 on 18 June, turning south to maintain distance while launching air strikes. The 652nd Naval Air Group was now strong of 81 Zeros, 27 D3As, 9 Yokosuka D4Y “Judy”, 18 Nakajima B6N “Jill” divided among the three ships.

Masaichi_Kondo The first air strike comprised 26 A6M2 Zeros (loaded with bombs), 16 A6M5 Zeros in escort, 7 B6Ns, taking off at 09:30, but misdirected. Still, 12 kept searching and eventually found TF 38 but a B6N and five A6M2s were shot down by their CAP. The second air strike (27 Vals, 9 Judys, 2 Jills, 26 Zeros) took off at 11:00 with 18 A6Ms/B6Ns from Shōkaku and Zuikaku and also misdirected, finding nothing. They later reached Rota and Guam to refuel. Underway some spotted the essex-class USS Wasp and Bunker Hill but whe attacking, where wiped out by AA, spotted by Radar. The rest, also radar-directed were anihilated by 41 F6F Hellcats. In all, 49 survived the ondlaught, including for CarDiv2 a single A6M5, one D4Y, seven D3As.

Veering northwest to regroup and refuel they were eventually catched by the US air striked and targeted. IJN Jun’yō was soon a framed by several near-misses from dive bombers and eventually hit by two bombs near her island. Flight operations were suspended while the small 652nd Naval Air Group’s CAP claimed 7 attackers, 4 probable, but loosing 11 Zeros, 3 more ditching. What was left of their air group was disbanded on 10 July and the remaining personnel reassigned to Air Group 653. This was the end for carrier operations in CarDiv 2.

Emerging from Kure, IJN Jun’yō stayed in the Inland Sea, training without aircraft, until 27 October to taxiing men and materiel to Borneo. On 3 November, she was ambushed by USS Pintado near Makung, but she was saved of by the prompt decision of the captain of IJN Akikaze, her escorting destroyer which deliberately intercepted the running torpedoes. She sank with no survivors. Later, Jun’yō was ambushed again by USS Barb and Jallao, but they missed.

On 25 November, while underway to Manila via Makung, to meet IJN Haruna and the destroyers Suzutsuki, Fuyutsuki, and Maki, she carried 200 survivors from IJN Musashi and was attacked by USS Sea Devil, Plaice and Redfish on 9 December 1944, at the first hours. Three torpedoes hit her belt, flooding several compartments, killing 19 men and so she took a 10°–12° list to starboard, still having enough engine power to reached Sasebo for repairs.

moored at Sasebo, autumn 1945
Junyo moored at Sasebo, autumn 1945

But they were abandoned after little work has been done in March 1945: Lack of materials, men led to this decision and she was moved to Ebisu Bay on 1st April and camouflaged from 23 April, now a “guard ship” from 20 June. Her armament was stripped off on 5 August. The Allies eventually arrived after the ceasefire on 2 September and she surrendered. A technical team evaluated her condition on 8 October and estimated her a “constructive total loss” se she was stricken on 30 November, scrapped on 1 June 1946-1 August 1947.

Same, 19 October 1945

IJN Taihō (1943)
Light Aircraft Carrier IJN Ryūhō (1933)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *